In the last one and a half to two years, the global geopolitical situation has escalated significantly. Russia's relations with Ukraine, Georgia, the EU, the USA, Japan, Canada, Australia and other countries have deteriorated. The countries exchanged mutual sanctions. The military confrontation between the United States and Russia has also escalated, and normal relations between Russia and Ukraine have been practically destroyed.
The US is testing new types of weapons. The other day, a test of a new modernized atomic bomb was carried out. Russia is also constantly testing promising types of weapons. Military aircraft and ships of NATO and Russia periodically collide and demonstrate unfriendly behavior. Against this background, Ukraine continues to passive-aggressively destroy the east of its own country. All this as a whole looks very disturbing.
WILL THERE BE A WAR IN RUSSIA IN 2016?
In general, people are afraid of two scenarios for the development of events. This is the war between Russia and Ukraine in 2016. What's scary. But even worse is the possible war between Russia and the United States in 2016. However, both scenarios look almost unbelievable.
If in Ukraine the adequacy of the top leadership raises questions, then in Russia the main people in the country think soberly and will never allow a war with Ukraine. Such a scenario could lead to conflict with NATO countries.
The conflict between Russia and NATO is also very dangerous, given the fact that NATO member countries have nuclear weapons and a large number of powerful cruise missiles and other non-nuclear weapons. The war between Russia and the United States also scares people extremely, because the exchange of nuclear strikes will lead to the fact that there will be no winners.
The United States is developing a lightning strike strategy that provides for the rapid destruction of all the most important infrastructure nodes in Russia, and the missile defense system (anti-missile defense) should protect against a retaliatory strike from Russia.
However, no one knows how the missile defense system will work against Russian missiles. In addition, promising hypersonic missiles are being developed in Russia, which are almost impossible to shoot down. Russia also has a nuclear triad - submarines with nuclear weapons, static nuclear mines, and air forces with nuclear weapons. Also, no one knows if the “Perimeter, Dead Hand” system, a system of automatic retaliation from Russia, is now working if it is seriously hit. No US leader in their right mind would attack Russia. Rather, in the United States they are aggravating the situation with their rhetoric, focusing on the domestic voter.
However, recently the United States called Russia one of the main threats to the world and specifically to the United States. But it is clear that Russia does not threaten the States, Europe or anyone else.
DRY RESIDUE
Of course, there will be no large-scale war in Russia in 2016. You do not need to be a military analyst or psychic to do this. Our country fought in the 20th century so that now the population of the country could be twice as large as it is. And we still feel the demographic waves that we have left after World Wars 1 and 2. And given that Russia spends astronomical sums of money on re-equipping the army with the most modern technology, no one will dare to attack us.
The first thing the Anglo-Saxons traditionally do when planning some kind of dirty trick is to a priori blame the intended victim for it. Today, when the media subordinate to them from every iron talk about the inevitable and obligatory Russian invasion of the Baltic states, Ukraine and Poland, it is from them that you can guess where and how the Anglo-Saxons are going to arrange another war in the European theater of operations, when, how and with what forces they are going cross the border of the Russian Federation.
After the American, German and Polish, even Canadian intelligence lit up with the exposure of “imminent Russian aggression”:
“According to the Canadian Intelligence and Security Service, Russia in recent times began re-equipping its army on a huge scale. Regular units of the armed forces are being modernized. The state is preparing for war,” write analysts whose opinion is quoted by Gazeta Wyborcza.
The report describes in detail the possible military scenarios instead of the so-called hybrid war, which (supposedly S.V.) was carried out by Russia in the Crimea and Eastern Ukraine.
The Canadians also argue that the Russians have no desire to cooperate peacefully with Europe and North America. At the same time, they emphasize that the economic sanctions imposed on Moscow have so far not brought any result in the direction of changing Russian politics towards the West, sums up the Polish edition.
At the same time, the question “And to hell with Russia, deindustrialized and heavily indebted Poland and the Baltic States?” considered indecent and inappropriate and carefully ignored. That is, from the intended victim of aggression - Russia - they are carefully molded into an aggressor, which allows us to confidently assert that Russia's accusers are preparing to directly and openly attack her as soon as favorable conditions arise for this.
At the same time, the Anglo-Saxons declared the mobilization to be worldwide. It would seem, where is Poland, and where is Canada, but come on, not just intelligence, but also the leadership of NATO troops in Latvia is being taken over by the Maple Leaf Country, deploying its troops directly on the border with the Russian Federation, that is, they are preparing for war against Russia and on the territory of Russia. The final solution of the Russian question (Barbarossa 2.0) moves from theory to practice.
The case was left to favorable circumstances. Let's single out the following:
1) Europe, as the main victim of the upcoming mess, should:
A) Be ready to fight with Russia for the happiness of the Anglo-Saxons to the last European
B) I agree to be robbed to the skin by the Anglo-Saxons, regardless of the outcome of hostilities
And Europe is doing its best to justify these Anglo-Saxon expectations.
At the same time, the European elite is divided before our eyes into two antagonistic camps, one of which - strictly pro-American - requires complete obedience to the transcorps from Fintern and patience, after which it promises to pay off Napoleonic and Hitler's bills for "chickens, milk, eggs" at the expense of Slavic "subhumans"
The second European camp, impressed by the “Fuck EU” from Victoria Nuland and guessing that the Anglo-Saxons do not intend to share the loot not only with Russian, but also with European compradors, is trying, if not to cancel, then at least slow down Europe’s slide into a new big war, but their the voices are now in the suppressed minority, as a result of which the whole of Europe as a whole squeaks, chokes, but eats the anti-Russian Russophobic cactus.
The EU is a bureaucratic empire seeking expansion at the expense of neighboring territories. An empire that is so aggressive also because it does not have political independence - the EU is de facto occupied by the Americans. Therefore, the anti-Russian vector of Brussels' policy is consistent, growing in goals and systemic. It resulted in the well-known Eastern Partnership campaign. No one even concealed that the main goal of the European Union is to tear everyone away from Russia as much as possible.
Now, for the sake of their own survival, the Anglo-Saxons need to break Russia itself. At the same time, the colonial government in the Russian Federation no longer suits them as much as they like - Russian officials and oligarchs, even loyal to the Fintern to the board, turned out to be so voracious, and the economic situation in the “civilized world” itself is so bad that even crumbs from the master’s table can be shared with the natives expensive. And that means - only tin and trash, only hardcore and a complete transition of all natural resources into the hands of "real - true - Anglo-Saxon masters" with the complete utilization of the natives, following the example of the American Indians.
The second favorable factor is within Russia itself.
Modern conquistadors are actively looking for the “Montezuma” they need in the Russian expanses, and both a washed-up liberal and a leavened patriot will suit this role, if only not to interfere, but to help kindle the flames of war on the European continent, without noticing the overseas ears sticking out behind the whole and every provocation, behind each and every “unknown sniper”, behind any and every terrorist attack by “some crazy loner” or an Islamic state miraculously fighting and committing terrorist attacks only there and only when it brings the greatest profit to financial geniuses from Wall -straight.
Analysts who model the military aggression of the West and Russia's ability to repel this aggression constantly make the same methodological mistake - assuming that there will be a wall-to-wall cut-and-paste, where only enemies are in front, and exclusively and only ours behind ... But the Anglo-Saxons so they never fight.
Their mechanized columns will go on the attack only if ... Remember how in June 1941 aviation in Belarus was disarmed and crowded at several airfields, the gun sights were removed and sent for inspection, the command staff was withdrawn from their units for study and various conferences ... And now, put your hand in your heart, tell me, why is this impossible today? Do you have complete confidence that no one will prevent Topols and Yars from reaching their starting lines? That the space constellation and the early detection system will not suddenly go blind? That the necessary order will arrive on time and will be carried out by everyone who must?
I would like your confidence, gentlemen-comrade optimists. Gelentvagen show convinces me otherwise. And this show, and other, quite objective management indicators and indicators of managers convince that everything is not at all rosy, and the Anglo-Saxons constantly, consistently and persistently solve their main task - the formation of a multi-storey fifth column, which is the main and main favorable circumstance for another attempt to attack Russia.
By the behavior of the Anglo-Saxons, one can even guess how far they have advanced in this business and at what stage they are. Today, the number of “friends” among the Russian elite allows them to lie with impunity and be rude without pain, but does not allow them to start redistributing property. And if they rush, then this will indicate that they (from their point of view) in the corridors of power and army barracks have formed a critical mass of Judas, who will ensure, as in 1991, capitulation even without a battle ...
Well, the very rhetoric of the modern servants of the new Reich, the dynamics of rudeness and lies, the military preparations themselves indicate that they are at the finish line, there is very little left before the critical mass of traitors is recruited and they do not intend to stop.
Why they will lose again is the topic of a separate note. In short, the Anglo-Saxons are again let down by their linear logic, according to which, where 2 + 2, there must necessarily be 4 .... It works everywhere. But not in Russia. Russia never fell under this formula. Doesn't fit even now. But the trouble is elsewhere
In the face of the Anglo-Saxons, Russia (and indeed the entire “uncivilized world”) has lost an equivalent intellectual partner capable of conducting a fully meaningful dialogue. ... today, in relations with them, the factor of brute, physical strength is increasingly coming to the fore. Alas, but this is practically all that they still understand. And if so, as Big Brother said at the Chicago forum in 2015: “Europe believed too much in its own exclusively and it will have to remember both its cities on fire and corpses on crowded streets ...”
Reference:
“The United States has all its nuclear power concentrated in nuclear weapons, on 14 Ohio SSBNs. These are 3.000 warheads W76 and 400 warheads W88. Everything else is of no interest. When you try a sudden disarming strike (and this is the only possible option), the main missile launch area is a traverse of the northeastern tip of Novaya Zemlya and in the area of \u200b\u200bthe New Siberian Islands, from where to Uzhur and other areas where our missile regiments are deployed no more than 3,000 km with a flying time of less than 15 minutes .
Ice conditions allow strikes from mid-July to the end of September. The optimal time is the second half of August.”
By the way: Ivanov, then defense minister, warned that bringing a NATO fleet into the Kara Sea would be an act of war. And the Russian Aerospace Forces will inflict a preemptive nuclear strike on it.
Order an astrological forecast for 2016 from Bert Macover!
Will there be a war in 2016?
Hello, friends. Hello Bert. Today's show will be dedicated to the upcoming 2016. In it we will talk about what surprises 2016 will bring us, talk about how to live in the new conditions new planet. In the second part of the program, we will discuss the traditions of celebrating the New Year, or rather, their meaning from the point of view of Vedic astrology. So, what is the main planet we will have in 2016, what kind of planet is it, what is its character and how to adapt to it, how to live in the new conditions of the new planet? Tell us please.
Hello everybody. 2016 - well, I think it's not difficult to calculate - we get a "nine". Nine is Mars. Well, Mars, respectively, is a red planet, as you all remember from school, and when we sometimes get angry, we blush. That is, it turns out that Mother Earth will be angry and blush. Let's say the earth is "burning" under our feet, you can say so.
Attention, promotion for everyone with a zodiac sign SAGITTARIUS! To those who were born from December 15 to January 15 It is possible to get a 40% discount on video consultation. Consultation example: https://youtu.be/TZff3ws-XsI Hurry up - the promotion is valid while the Sun is in Sagittarius! Send your date, place, time of birth, as well as your questions to . In the response letter you will receive payment instructions including the discount.
Subscribe to free daily forecasts on my website and plan your day.
- Category: Uncategorized
In this corridor - Lachin, there were Kurdish villages. And that's where Red Kurdistan was created - a small, but very important of the geopolitical types of national-cultural autonomy.
The Turkish authorities then generally banned the use of the word Kurd, demanding that it be replaced with "mountain Turk". To create under these conditions a "laboratory" for the cultivation of a national Kurdish identity was a strong challenge not only in relation to the Shah's Iran, British Iraq, but also to fraternal Turkey. For international games around Kurdistan, read J. Aldridge's "Mountains and Weapons" (continuation of "The Diplomat").
Stalin really needed the Kurds. In the event that, while defending Finland, the British would decide to carry out their threat to bomb the Baku oil fields (and how else could they stop Hitler's ally), then the planes would take off from Mosul. And here the help of the Kurdish partisans who commit sabotage against the Mosul air base would be absolutely invaluable.
In 1945, when Stalin created South Azerbaijan, Free Kurdistan was also in the plans, for which cadres had already been ideologically tempered in the Lak enclave. But a year later, Truman hit the atomic (well, fist) on the table, the USSR left sovereign Iran, the sovereign Tehran Majlis categorically refused to ratify the treaties already signed and very, very beneficial to Moscow, and the Iranian authorities, their “liberated - after the Soviet occupation in August 1941 - they cleared the north [the hand didn’t go to add “on the conscience”]”. This is how Moscow's first betrayal of the Kurds took place.
As long as the Kurds worried not only NATO member Turkey and pro-American Iraq, everything was in order. But then the "progressive" Hussein reigned in Baghdad. Starting with public executions of Jews, he quickly switched to the Kurds [I sincerely hope that on the scaffold he remembered not only puffs of gas over Kurdish villages in March 1988, which his Kurdish escort took care of, but also the gallows on Tehran Square in January 1969]. Moscow, rushing about, achieved the conclusion of a historic truce in Kurdistan 45 years ago. But the Baghdadian, as the Strugatsky brothers would have written, “micro-Hitler” (they have a description in “Predatory things of the century” of a “refugee” dissatisfied with the “overweight” of the West - a swarthy general in a luxurious uniform), despised all the conditions for a truce, and brought down all the power on the Kurds his artillery. Moscow, as the guarantor of the deal, diligently forgot about its obligations. This was her second betrayal of the Kurds.
Years have passed. This spring, Putin and Lavrov, entangled in their Syrian intrigues, and not knowing what to do next after the Palmyra concert of Gergiev-Roldugin, began to flirt with the Kurds with might and main. Moscow urgently welcomed the creation by the Kurds of some kind of multinational autonomy near the southern borders of Turkey (then still the main enemy) and began to demand the presence of a Kurdish delegation at the talks on Syria, which caused the fury of Damascus (the central part of the city is the suburbs of the rebels). Hints of federalization of Syria began. Everyone remembered the Russian fate in the “federalization” of Ukraine [you will laugh sadly, but Russian diplomacy before Minsk-2 called the Donetsk separatists “supporters of federalization”] and shuddered. The temptation to recapture the Syrian Kurds from the Americans and, thereby, to get a powerful lever of influence on the situation in Syria, Turkey and Iraq was so great that it overshadowed all the promises to Assad Jr. maintain the "paper" unity of Syria.
It should be recalled that since last autumn, the Rossiya-24 channel has been constantly making apologetic reports about the preparation of detachments of the PKK in Syria, with an emphasis on the participation of women in them - like, not fundamentalists.
The famous soothsayer on the flight of double-headed eagles, Avgur Alekseevich Venediktov, even scattered hints that America’s refusal to agree to Putin’s terms on Syria would lead to the emergence of a pro-Russian Kurdistan (here we must recall the dramatic game in the voice of AAB: “and few will seem to anyone”).
In a word, the lame Washington duck was once again offered to "buy a brick." But then fraternization with Erdogan came urgently. The Kurds did not betray America, with whose special forces they sneezed the ISIS, and Moscow bombed the Kurdish positions, diligently almost hitting the American unit. Thus began the Small Russian-Kurdish War. Thus ended the third betrayal of the Kurds by Moscow ...
No related content
This article may seem intimidating. But we all live in such a time that the start of a new global war is becoming a real prospect. In the article we will answer the question of whether the date of the beginning of the Third World War is predicted or not.
modern warfare
In the view of most people who grew up on filmography based on the Great Patriotic War, the standard of fighting looks like a clipping from a movie. Reasoning logically, we understand that just as a saber from 1917 would look ridiculous in the hands of a Soviet soldier in 1941, it will be strange to observe a picture of barbed wire being cut at night by partisans in our time.
Yes, and you must admit, having weapons of mass destruction in the form of nuclear charges, bacteriological crops and climate control, it is paradoxical to expect a repetition of the classics in the form of a bayonet-knife and a dugout.
Quiet panic, gradually undermining the Internet users and skillfully fueled by the media, is felt in the thousands of requests received every hour. People are so convinced of the inevitability of trouble that they almost never ask questions - will it happen? Much more relevant is the clumsy wording: when is the exact date for the start of World War III set?
And now this is scary.
Battle for resources
The era when forests, fields, rivers and the defeated people were the main contribution to the winner has passed irrevocably. Today, the greatness of the country is dictated not by population and not by a rich history of victories, but by the possession of underground treasures: oil sources, natural gas deposits, coal seams, uranium deposits.
The date of the beginning of the Third World War is not hushed up. She just passed so long ago that her exact number is hardly preserved in the minds. The dream of the engines of trade policy has come true - the economy and the struggle for first place in the leadership elite have become the main values of life.
Here it is useful to recall the main method of trade relations, which works everywhere and at all times. The most selective piece was never given to those who bargained and fought for it - there was always someone third, standing aside and sympathetically watching the fight.
Based on events: how can it be
Many will intervene, one will get it. It is no secret that the main threat to Russia is attributed to the United States, but the events unfolding around the world's largest leaders suggest that the general tension creates only the appearance of a real threat. The flow of information masterfully maintains the highest bar on the scale of mass hysteria, while the war unleashed by a mighty power (read - the United States) began a long time ago.
Events in Ukraine, Iraq, and Syria speak not of spontaneous, but of carefully thought-out actions, on which not a single hundred analysts with a wealth of strategic experience have worked, which simply does not exist in any of these countries. After all, we are not talking about random clashes, reminiscent of the previous yard-to-yard fights - we are talking about a war that draws in the masses. And here all sorts of peacekeeping missions with the introduction of friendly troops at the ready with friendly weapons only fuel the hostile mood.
The EU readily accepts information in the form in which it is presented by the United States - the EU apparently has neither the time nor the initiative to investigate. Like a bull on a red rag, the leaders of the European Union will react to the slightest move by the United States towards military action against Russia.
This will give a reason to talk for a long time to the restraining Chinese government. The stagnation of American troops in the Pacific region has long poisoned the existence of the patient Chinese, whose hand is already tired of trembling over the nuclear button. Israel's reaction is also predictable - a long-awaited consensual nod from the United States will allow them to fall on Tehran, but how long Israel itself will last after that is a big question. The last volleys in Iraq will hardly have time to die down, as Libyan, Omani, Yemeni and (where without them) Egyptian bombs will simply sweep away the unlucky aggressor.
Anyone else interested in the start date of World War III? Then we discuss further.
Side view - how it will be
It is useful to hear what he thinks about the events, it is scary to say - the future, retired Colonel General Anatoly Lopata, the former chief General Staff Armed Forces of Ukraine and First Deputy Minister of Defense of Ukraine. Looking ahead, we note that the remark of the former Minister of Defense about the location of the future battlefield completely coincides with the opinion of British Air Force Colonel Ian Shields.
To the question of journalists, what is, in fact, the Third World War and when it starts, Anatoly Lopata calmly explained that the war is in full swing and the aggressor country is called in it - who would you think? - of course, Russia. And even in relation to America, at least in the fact that it responds with sympathy to the Assad regime in Syria (!). At the same time, the colonel general admits that the United States is forced to reckon with the Russian Federation and this will remain unchanged, due to the huge economic and military potential of the latter.
The date of the start of the Third World War, according to the specialist, thus belongs to the distant past, but its development to the scale of epic battles is in the future, which still needs to be lived up to. Anatoly Lopata even shared a mysterious figure - 50. In his opinion, it is after this number of years that the warring powers will clash in the wide expanses of space.
Analyst forecasts
Joachim Hagopian, who has been known since 2015, warned that the recruitment of "friends" by the US and Russia is not accidental. China and India will follow Russia in any case, and the EU countries have no choice but to accept America's policy. In Korea, Hagopian predicted military neutrality with respect to both powers, but a rather stormy internecine war with the possibility of activating nuclear charges. It can be assumed that the day when the powerful weapon is put into action is the date of the beginning of the Third World War.
Alexander Richard Schiffer, an interesting personality and former head of NATO, in his book: "2017: War with Russia", predicted the defeat of the United States due to financial collapse, followed by the collapse of the American army.
Vladimir Zhirinovsky, as always, is unambiguous and says what the majority is delicately silent about. He is confident that America will not start any open action until all the countries involved in the military conflict squabble among themselves in collapse, and, exhausted, lay down what remains of their weapons. Then the US will generously gather up the dejected losers and emerge as the sole winner.
Sergei Glazyev, Advisor to the President of the Russian Federation, proposes to create a coalition that fundamentally does not support a military policy against Russia. The set of countries that are officially ready to speak out in favor of renunciation of armed conflict, according to him, will be such that America will simply be forced to moderate its appetites.
According to Vanga
The date of the beginning of the Third World War Vanga, the most famous Bulgarian seer, either could not or did not want to predict. In order not to confuse the minds with specifics, the clairvoyant said only that she sees religious strife around the world as the cause of the war. Drawing a parallel with current events, it can be assumed that the date of the start of the Third World War, which Vanga did not predict, falls on the period of terrorist acts of the ISIS group disguised as offended religious feelings.
Operating with exact dates
How not to mention the world-famous American Horatio Villegas, whose vision of fiery spheres hitting the earth from heaven in 2015 became a sensation. Adjusting quite materialistic tasks to the act of clairvoyance, Horatio hastened to announce that he knew the date of the start of the Third World War - 05/13/2017. With regret or great joy, we note that no one had to observe the fireballs on May 13.
It remains to be hoped that people who expected big events in March 2017 were not very upset when they lost confirmation of the words of astrologer Vlad Ross. Recall that this person also named the date of the start of the Third World War - 03/26/2017, which did not find a response in reality.
